Writer, Article: 0-99

  • Antdix, How to avoid parking hassle: (50) Good Formatting and grammar, subject matter was skeptical at best. Trades one issue for another major issue.
  • Caramelsunshine, Rumble in the sky: (30) Read very much like 'word salad' other articles largely looked the same. Could use better editing, formatting and a stronger reason for not spelling words properly.
  • Fheenix, Drop shipping: (92) Easy to read article, useful information and good references.
  • Jdean1, The city of phoenix: (35) Could definitely use more in-depth information, it's fairly sparse. It would benefit from references and pictures.
  • Jessiewaterfield, Critical review on oklahoma: (30) Hard to digest information, would benefit from proper formatting and could definitely use less citations in the midst. It looks like padding and interrupts the flow of the article.
  • Jimfoxy, Death is like a wolf at the door: (30) Difficult to follow and tell it's a real story instead of fiction. Image isn't properly coded to appear on the page. Pacing goes back and forth and skips around making it difficult to read.
  • Maximilian_wilhelm, Another galaxy phone accident: (60) Interesting article, would benefit from pictures of the phones in question (seeing as one is from reddit) but lacks citations and doesn't back up the story very well.
  • Rich2014, Dickie august baseball player chapter 5 - what does she know: (30) While fiction is subjective to the reader, the double-spacing made this incredibly hard to read. There were also minor grammatical errors and it would greatly improve by moving to a more standardized novel format with proper paragraphs and separation.
  • Theuntitled, Photoshop touch vs. pixlr express: (60) Intriguing article, though for a review on image editors there were no images present. Showcasing the various pros and cons in an easier to read manner (whether tables or images) would have helped greatly too.

QR Code
QR Code rating_penguinwriter_35 (generated for current page)