Writer, Article: 0-99

• Backa18, Criminal minds: 65 (Well written articles, however few references to outside material)
• Cryptoaddicto, Btcvacations – bitcoin’s first full service online travel agency opens for business: 59 (Articles on good topics but most lack any substantial references)
• Devtome_writer, Bio-lite homestove: 55 (Superficial content in some pieces. Too many unfinished articles. Good use of references. Images would be useful)

• Jackrussell, My experiences in using bitcoin: 50 (images not referenced correctly, some articles well referenced, others none at all, content mixed bag of interesting and uninteresting)
• Max2838, The death of the us dollar: 20 (no substance to the content, however well formatted. In most cases a reader would have no choice but to the buy the 'inspiration' books to make any sense of the articles)
• Melodiemuse, Devcoin fund investment: 95 (well written and referenced content, great fiction.)

• Papacrusher, How to avoid a traffic ticket: 96 (many great reading articles, could use better images in your articles but many were ironic enough to entice a chuckle)
• Pepegom, Swap: 40 (dry topics, which need simplifying for the intended mass audience. Could use some examples to make them easier to understand. Needs images and references)

• Stealtheh, Analysisoftheblackplague: 65 (interesting topics, well written but very short and lack depth, and referencing for non fiction pieces)
• Wardsmith, Chaos in the media: 55 (mostly well written but odd articles. one article with good references and others with none. Seems unfinished.)