DEVTOME.COM HOSTING COSTS HAVE BEGUN TO EXCEED 115$ MONTHLY. THE ADMINISTRATION IS NO LONGER ABLE TO HANDLE THE COST WITHOUT ASSISTANCE DUE TO THE RISING COST. THIS HAS BEEN OCCURRING FOR ALMOST A YEAR, BUT WE HAVE BEEN HANDLING IT FROM OUR OWN POCKETS. HOWEVER, WITH LITERALLY NO DONATIONS FOR THE PAST 2+ YEARS IT HAS DEPLETED THE BUDGET IN SHORT ORDER WITH THE INCREASE IN ACTIVITY ON THE SITE IN THE PAST 6 MONTHS. OUR CPU USAGE HAS BECOME TOO HIGH TO REMAIN ON A REASONABLE COSTING PLAN THAT WE COULD MAINTAIN. IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO SUPPORT THE DEVTOME PROJECT AND KEEP THE SITE UP/ALIVE PLEASE DONATE (EVEN IF ITS A SATOSHI) TO OUR DEVCOIN 1M4PCuMXvpWX6LHPkBEf3LJ2z1boZv4EQa OR OUR BTC WALLET 16eqEcqfw4zHUh2znvMcmRzGVwCn7CJLxR TO ALLOW US TO AFFORD THE HOSTING.

THE DEVCOIN AND DEVTOME PROJECTS ARE BOTH VERY IMPORTANT TO THE COMMUNITY. PLEASE CONTRIBUTE TO ITS FURTHER SUCCESS FOR ANOTHER 5 OR MORE YEARS!

Writer, Article: 0-99

  • Bmlzootown, Wuthering heights a poetic summary: 84 (A poetic summary, as Bmlzootown calls it. Enjoyed it a lot. Easy to read and good story. Wasn't familiar at all with this type of work, rather interested in it now!)
  • Caramelsunshine, Si - nothing but a thing: 50 (No capital letters! Makes it very tough to read. Also no categorization and no images. Content and good grammar makes up for it a bit, but lacks too much for it too reach a better grade)
  • Ibrennan, League of legends: 79 (Good content, well written and easy to read. Good grammar. No pictures and no categorization caused some deduction of points, other than that, good article.)
  • Infoporter, Novacoin: 84 (Good formatting, good content and good grammar. Did pretty much everything good. Lacks images and category]]
  • Kickaha4, Road trip: 83 (Nice content, excellent grammar and spelling. Was a pleasure to read!)
  • Mrc, How to upgrade your led dynamo flashlight: 84 (Let's start by saying the formatting is very well done. Everything is clear and the pictures are placed at the correct place. Content is a bit curt at times but not bad.)
  • Odolvlobo, Vision 45: 76 (Well written, rather small though, not much else too say about it. Well above average)
  • Shakezula, Linux paper research analysis: 78 (Article analysis, well written and good answers analysis. Formatting could be better (make the questions bold/italics to make it clear what are questions, what are answers, etc.) No images. Other than that, well done.)
  • Smeagol, Sat (assessment): 80 (Short, but straight to the point. Great use of images in this article. The table gives a good overview about the SAT test. Only point of improvement might be a larger explanation on the scores, what is considered a 'good' score etc.)
  • Tom, Macbeth opening analysis: 84 (Very interesting topic. Well thought out and well written. Lack of images is a shame, would go good in this article. Also no category. Very good article besides that.)
  • Tosku, Agile software development: 83 (Good formatting, which was essential in this article. Well written sentences makes it all a pleasure to read. Good article. Lacks category)
  • Wolf, Rijndael: 80 (Excellent formatting. The content is good, but can be a bit beginner unfriendly at times. Other than that, well done article)

QR Code
QR Code rating_dinkleberg_32 (generated for current page)
 

Advertise with Anonymous Ads