DEVTOME.COM HOSTING COSTS HAVE BEGUN TO EXCEED 115$ MONTHLY. THE ADMINISTRATION IS NO LONGER ABLE TO HANDLE THE COST WITHOUT ASSISTANCE DUE TO THE RISING COST. THIS HAS BEEN OCCURRING FOR ALMOST A YEAR, BUT WE HAVE BEEN HANDLING IT FROM OUR OWN POCKETS. HOWEVER, WITH LITERALLY NO DONATIONS FOR THE PAST 2+ YEARS IT HAS DEPLETED THE BUDGET IN SHORT ORDER WITH THE INCREASE IN ACTIVITY ON THE SITE IN THE PAST 6 MONTHS. OUR CPU USAGE HAS BECOME TOO HIGH TO REMAIN ON A REASONABLE COSTING PLAN THAT WE COULD MAINTAIN. IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO SUPPORT THE DEVTOME PROJECT AND KEEP THE SITE UP/ALIVE PLEASE DONATE (EVEN IF ITS A SATOSHI) TO OUR DEVCOIN 1M4PCuMXvpWX6LHPkBEf3LJ2z1boZv4EQa OR OUR BTC WALLET 16eqEcqfw4zHUh2znvMcmRzGVwCn7CJLxR TO ALLOW US TO AFFORD THE HOSTING.

THE DEVCOIN AND DEVTOME PROJECTS ARE BOTH VERY IMPORTANT TO THE COMMUNITY. PLEASE CONTRIBUTE TO ITS FURTHER SUCCESS FOR ANOTHER 5 OR MORE YEARS!

Pigs Spotted Flying As Rachel Maddow Questions Aspects Of Boston Bombing

maddowpigs.jpg

Rachel Maddow, one of the talking heads on state run TV, MS-NBC, and formerly the morning radio talk show host of the now defunct Air America Radio network, has stunned conspiracy researchers and other awakened individuals around the world recently. She gave an honest and rousing opinion piece on the execution style slaying, by the FBI, of a potential witness in the Boston Marathon bombings case.

Maddow has made a career out of denying conspiracies and trying to make fun of people who are not up against their own cognitive dissonance, which allows them to be able to connect rather obvious dots. I'm not sure if Maddow is genuinely connecting dots herself, here, or if she's conducting what is known among researchers as a, “limited hangout.”

You never know when a mainstream news personality who makes a living trying to discredit open minded researchers, is sincerely unable to see what is going on, and hence is acting as a useful idiot to the powers that be, or if she is coming from a more sinister position. No doubt, a lot of the most ardent and well know global conspiracy debunkers are acutely aware of the elite cabal that has already established a world hegemony, and is ready to transform it into a global dictatorship, ruled by sheer tyranny.

It is difficult to say what percentage of debunkers are working for the cabal on a quid quo pro basis, and what percentage are simply doing the cabal's bidding unknowingly. Even in the latter instances, the reason they may have achieved success in media is because of the good work they do to slow down the awakening process among the public, (even if they are not consciously aware of what they are doing.)

In recent years, the awakening is quickening, as evidenced by the absolute decimation of the audience of mainstream media sources, and the dramatic increase in popularity of alternative media outlets and personalities like Alex Jones, Jeff Rense, Glenn Beck, Matt Drudge and many others.

It is therefore possible that a new tactic is being played out in mainstream media, starting with Ms. Maddow's diatribe on the obvious FBI murder and cover up of said murder, of an evidently key witness, a man who knew too much, regarding intricacies of the Boston Marathon bombings. It is extremely possible, and maybe even likely, that, in an effort to prevent losing all credibility, we are going to start seeing limited hangouts of truth in the corporate, state run media.

The concept of a limited hangout, is, a particular aspect of an event will be reported truthfully, but all the other aspects will be reported in the business as usual, pathological liar mode. This may or may not be what Maddow was doing the other night, late February, 2014, when she went on for several minutes, providing details that most awakened people are already thoroughly familiar with.

Regardless of her true intention, when Maddow focuses her formidable talents on speaking truth to power, as opposed to trying make people she doesn't like look bad, she is extremely effective. If she is, indeed, doing a limited hangout, I think it will ultimately backfire.

I say this because when someone who is known for towing the official Republi-cratic party line, suddenly speaks truth to power on one of the biggest conspiracy topics in recent history, it is an intense wake up call. People who ordinarily would not listen, perk their ears up and dare I say, even start to think.

Although it is extremely powerful, Maddow is not saying that the Boston Marathon bombings didn't have any real bombs, or that it had real bombs but was done by the government. Of all the holes and inconsistencies in the official narrative, she is currently focused on only two issues on the periphery of the story.

Yet, coming from someone who has spent untold hours doing her best to try to make fun of and discredit anyone who researches conspiratorial evidence, she might as well be single-handedly leading the truth movement. Make no mistake; this is a dramatic departure for her.

She tells of Ibragim Todashev, a friend of Tamerlin, the older of the Tsarneav brothers, whom police claim to have killed in self defense when trying to arrest him in connection to the Boston Marathon bombings. Maddow has yet to discuss the fact that the police claim to have evidence of Tsarneav leaving a book bag with a bomb at one of the two detonation sites, but for some inexplicable reason, never released said evidence to the public. Frankly, I”m not holding my breath for her to ever do so.

Nor does she mention that the Russian government recognized Tamerlin as an American alphabet soup agency asset who has attended terror related group meetings in Russia, designed to radicalize Muslims and incite violence against governments that are aligned with Russia.

The FBI tried to categorical deny such statements, but when the Russians publicly pressed the issue, the FBI was forced to admit that they were aware of his [US backed] terror associations and had been tracking him for years, which is a statement that family members had claimed from the beginning. To a person, they said he loved the United States and had been working for the government for quite some time.

As far as I know, Maddow is still not dealing with all kinds of Boston Marathon bombings evidence like this, and in fact may still be making fun of people who bring it up. Making fun of people is a classic defense mechanism that allows a person to not have to deal with evidence contrary to their belief system. It is also a propaganda technique that people use when they are aware of evidence, and don't want others to take a critical look.

I have yet to come up with enough evidence to sway my opinion on which camp Maddow is a member of; sincerely misguided, or downright nefarious. Even if her current position of appearing to open her mind on at least one or two aspects related to the Boston Marathon bombings is an insincere effort to gain a modicum of credibility in the eyes of the awakening masses, I take it as a really good sign.

If she really is sincere, then that is a great sign, because it is a perfect example of how people begin to wake up. It is often a somewhat gradual process in which a particular subject like the Boston Marathon bombings, or one aspect of it, is an area that the individual allows herself to look critically at evidence and process the data in a way she previously did not allow herself to do with the same kind of evidence.

Once that begins to happen to the point where the person begins to make surprising position change statements in public, it usually continues in other areas. For instance, if this is on the level, Maddow might actually come around and make statements later on that she is beginning to look at the actual bombings in a new light.

She might actually say, at some point in the future, that perhaps not all of the people who said it's part of a conspiracy involving the government are whack jobs like she had previously accused them of being. A person who is capable of making such statements publicly, is a person who is indicating the she isn't merely interested in winning arguments, as opposed to discovering the truth.

I would like to challenge you to take a look at your own life. If you have not needed to make any position changes on any matter of importance for many years, perhaps you can benefit from asking yourself what the possibility is that you have been 100% right about everything in the world for so long.

At any rate, time will give us a better understanding as to what is really happening with Ms. Maddow. As of now, I'm presuming she is still propping up the official story of the Tsarmaev brothers being the culprits of the Boston Marathon bombings, and that none of the victims were actors.

She is, however, doing a tremendous job letting people who would otherwise remain close minded about everything to do with this case, become aware, at least, that something is rotten in the state of the FBI. She points out that the FBI questioned Ibragim Todashev on five different occasions because he had known Tamerlin Tsarnaev.

They obviously had to believe that he had some information related to the case, or why else would they keep coming back? Before they visited him for the fifth time, he told people that this time, the FBI was definitely going to kill him. He was proven correct.

At least 3 agents held him at his apartment for 3 hours before they said he started attacking them, and they were forced to kill him, evidently, execution style, with 7 bullets; one of them to the top of his head. The only reason we know how he died is because a friend of Tsarvaem's took pictures of his body in the morgue and gave them to his father, who displayed them at a press conference.

The FBI is not only refusing to explain what happened; they have ordered other people not to talk, including the coroner. While there has been no explanation or details of why 3 armed men could not deal with one unarmed man without resorting to shooting him 7 times, including once in the top of his head, there have been some anonymous leaks to the press, which provides unlikely, or conflicting or totally immaterial information.

Unlikely & conflicting information includes the supposition that Todashev got a hold of a broom and came toward them, or that it wasn't a broom, but rather, he pushed a table at them. Irrelevant information is that he may have owned a ceremonial Japanese sword (that he is not even accused of touching when the FBI was questioning him.) Those and other statements like them, are anonymous leaks. Officially the FBI refuses to answer questions.

Maddow is right that the evidence that something is terribly afoul in this case is obvious. The irony is that for years, Maddow has been denying evidence like this on one topic after another, and has presented straw man arguments to make an uninformed public believe that this type of data does not exist and that the official story the government hands out is always the truth.

While some people may say that as far as they are concerned, this is too little, too late for Maddow; I say that it is better late than never, and she is to be applauded. While some people say she is not being forthcoming, and is in fact, ultimately trying to regain lost credibility while taking part in a limited hangout, I say that any reporting of the truth by Maddow is a good thing, regardless of motivation, and that it would ultimately backfire, because once people who were in the dark are exposed to the light of truth, it can be impossible to contain.

There is another criminal investigation that Maddow is speaking about that has connections to the Boston Marathon bombings, which she is also suspicious about. Two years before the bombing, three people were executed in a very gruesome way in an upscale neighborhood in greater Boston. It turns out that at least one of them was a friend of Tamerlin Tsarnaev.

Police have never come up with a suspect in that case, but after the death of Ibragim Todashev, there have been leaks to newspapers stating that before he was killed by the FBI, Todashev said that he helped Tsarnaev kill all three victims of that bizarre slaying ritual. The Boston Globe picked up on this anonymously leaked story, and presented it as if the police had given them such details on the record. Maddow isn't buying that either.

What these two stories seem to be indicating, to my eye, at least, is that a number of people who knew the Tsarnaev brothers, knew too much information and were taken out because of it. This is not uncommon among cases of criminal conspiracy.

What I find fascinating is how common it is to hear people express opinions that they can never accept conspiracy “theories,” because it just seems to them that there are always witnesses, who we would have heard from, if only such information was true. This attitude ignores five critical points of common sense that I can think of off the top of my head.

1) Witnesses (let alone accomplices) to these kinds of crimes get murdered. Dead men tell no tales.

2) Witnesses who aren't murdered, have seen others get murdered. Scared men tell no tales.

3) Witnesses come forward to try to tell what they know, but the media, being owned by the powers that are directing the conspiracies, refuse to give them a vehicle to spread the truth.

4) Witnesses come forward to tell law enforcement what they know, but law enforcement, at the top levels, being owned by the powers that are directing the conspiracies, refuse to pursue the case… (often leaving law enforcement at the bottom of the pyramid scratching their heads.)

5) Even if the skeptics managed to cross paths with the very witnesses they say they need to hear from before believing something, the skeptics would not listen to what they are saying, but instead, would make fun of their information and call them names, while feeling smug and superior to them.

A large percentage of people, perhaps even still the majority of people, simply don't want to know the truth. They want to believe that they are correct in their current view of how the world works. As such, they aren't even searching for the truth, and in fact, will often get angry at people who put the truth in their face, for interrupting their pattern of ensuring they are not exposed to information contrary to their beliefs.

The reality is that humanity is at such a crises point, right now, that we can not afford to do that any longer. If we are going to have any hope of stopping the plans of global enslavement through a one world dictatorship, it is incumbent upon us to quit trying to win arguments and prove we are right, as opposed to searching, open-mindedly, for the truth.

People who do that, begin to awaken. For some it is almost overnight. For others it is a slower process. Once you have awakened, it becomes your duty to help others go through the process. While the odds may initially seem stacked against us, you are making a mistake if you underestimate the power of the love of liberty.

If any of this strikes a chord within you – even though you tend to not believe conspiracy information – but you are open enough to be willing to look at evidence of the Boston Marathon bombings being staged, click here now.

When you get there, scroll down several inches and you will find a 16 part pictorial case study with hundreds of high definition photographs, including frame by frame action, with detailed descriptions to help you see what is going on in the commotion. This is done by David McGowan, who is not only among the most impressive researchers I've ever come across, but also happens to be one of the funniest people to ever incarnate in the history of planet earth; an interesting combination.

To watch Rachel Maddow calling out the FBI go here.

Politics


QR Code
QR Code pigs_spotted_flying_as_rachel_maddow_questions_aspects_of_boston_bombing (generated for current page)
 

Advertise with Anonymous Ads